- From: Sigbjørn Vik <sigbjorn@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 09:38:55 +0200
- To: public-web-perf@w3.org
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 20:02:39 +0200, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > My understanding from the Group is that the intent is to get both > specifications supported in user agents. The spec is stable. We already > have 3 browsers that supports Navigation Timing so we could recommend > its use. Navigation Timing 2 isn't finished and won't get to REC anytime > soon. Once we get that one to REC, it's reasonable to deprecated > Navigation Timing but we're not at that point yet. So, it seems to make > sense to me that we get Navigation Timing to REC and not throw the work > (and the patent commitments) after 2 years. I am not sure I see point of trying to get more browsers to support an already old specification, instead of the newer version, similar for the other points you make. Even less so, I don't think we should be spending more time on this issue, if the rest of the group feel we should take Navigation Timing 1 to recommendation, then let's do that, move on, and focus on the next issue. BTW, I still haven't seen an announcement to the list that the group has decided to start work on a new specification (Navigation Timing 2), I think such an email would be in order every time we do so, and better late than never. -- Sigbjørn Vik Core Quality Services Opera Software
Received on Monday, 18 June 2012 07:41:53 UTC