Re: [ResourceTiming] initiator types

On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com> wrote:

> > For instance, we're assuming the app is predominately HTML. However, if
> > it was mostly SVG, then it's not helpful for us to clump all the SVG
> elements
> > into one bucket.
>
> I think that is fair feedback. Considering the proposed change won't
> substantially change a developers ability to sort and will allow better
> sorting of SVG content, I agree to making a change here. Is there any
> feedback on the proposed change Ojan had suggested below? If not, I will
> update the spec to match this behavior.
>
> "If the initiator is an element, the initiatorType is the element's
> localname. If the initiator is a JavaScript object, the initiatorType is
> the name of the object's constructor. Resources downloaded via CSS url() or
> @import would be have the "link" or "style" initiatorType depending on
> which element the CSS was loaded from."
>

Sounds like there's no objections. Mind updating the spec?