- From: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:31:29 +0000
- To: Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
- CC: James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>, "dmandelin@mozilla.com" <dmandelin@mozilla.com>
We spoke about specifying it in the High Resolution Time spec. I will have a draft of that spec available for next week's conference call. It aligns very closely with what James has described in his proposal: http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-July/032343.html. Jatinder -----Original Message----- From: Tony Gentilcore [mailto:tonyg@google.com] Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 5:33 AM To: public-web-perf@w3.org Cc: James Robinson; dmandelin@mozilla.com Subject: Specifying window.performance.now() Last July, James Robinson proposed[1] window.performance.now() to the whatwg. We've talked about it several times in this group, but as far as I'm aware no one has created a draft spec yet. WebKit is ready to move forward with an implementation[2] and David Mandelin informs me Mozilla is ready as well[3]. Just so those initial prefixed versions line up as much as possible, I think it makes sense to have a draft spec somewhere before we start landing. So my questions are: 1. Does it make sense to add it to this group's charter[4]? 2. If so, who would like to edit it? James? -Tony [1] http://lists.whatwg.org/htdig.cgi/whatwg-whatwg.org/2011-July/032343.html [2] https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66684 [3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=539095#c29 [4] http://www.w3.org/2011/04/webperf
Received on Thursday, 23 February 2012 16:32:21 UTC