- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:00:49 -0500
- To: public-web-perf@w3.org, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
On 2/21/12 10:09 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > (Oh, and a friend of mine would like to see > http://www.w3.org/2010/webperf/track/issues/4 resolved.) I believe the right way to resolve it is to push it off to a future version of requestAnimationFrame and work on specifying it in parallel with getting what we have now advanced and unprefixed... There may be worries with having the unprefixed version do something with the extra arg and pages coming to depend on it, of course, but given current usage on pages (using the unprefixed name anyway), I think that ship has sailed. -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2012 18:01:19 UTC