- From: James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:43:33 -0800
- To: "Karen Anderson (IE)" <Karen.Anderson@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com>, "cam@mcc.id.au" <cam@mcc.id.au>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAD73mdJykMo0UVozB+5X-kYJbR1qTqhJ6H2E1vT8VFrpj6Nb0A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Karen Anderson (IE) < Karen.Anderson@microsoft.com> wrote: > I remember now that we want to encourage the use of performance.now() > which will be part of the high resolution time specification. I’ll make > sure that references to the animationStartTime property are removed and > updated. > Exactly - I think we want to spec something in that sort of namespace, but since it's not here yet we should probably hold off on adding references it to test suites. - James > **** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > Karen**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Karen Anderson (IE) [mailto:Karen.Anderson@microsoft.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 08, 2012 4:36 PM > *To:* James Robinson; Jatinder Mann > *Cc:* cam@mcc.id.au; public-web-perf@w3.org > *Subject:* RE: [requestAnimationFrame] Spec to LC?**** > > ** ** > > Hello,**** > > ** ** > > Yes, porting the test suite on the IE Test Center to our working group > will be a great start. I should be able to have it ready for review in the > next few weeks. Regarding the animationStartTime property, it was once in > the spec and there still are mentions of it in section 4.2 as an Editorial > note to add it back. There haven’t been any discussions on this in a > while. What is the thinking on it now? Seems to me that if we want to > have a high precision time as input to our callback that we should have a > method for getting a similarly high precision time independently as well.* > *** > > ** ** > > Thoughts?**** > > -Karen**** > > ** ** > > *From:* James Robinson [mailto:jamesr@google.com] > *Sent:* Wednesday, February 08, 2012 3:53 PM > *To:* Jatinder Mann > *Cc:* cam@mcc.id.au; public-web-perf@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: [requestAnimationFrame] Spec to LC?**** > > ** ** > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:56 AM, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com> > wrote:**** > > James, Cameron,**** > > **** > > Do you feel that the requestAnimationFrame spec is ready to move to Last > Call? In today’s working group conf call, we were discussing the status of > all specifications and noticed that there are no remaining open issues on > this particular spec. **** > > **** > > The IE Test Center has a few requestAnimationFrame tests from a few months > ago - > http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/ietestcenter/#perfPaintNotification. I > am looking to update the tests to match the current spec status and submit > them for the requestAnimationFrame test suite in the near future.**** > > ** ** > > Hello,**** > > ** ** > > I've resolved the remaining open issues and think going to Last Call is a > great idea. I'm also excited about having a test suite. > http://samples.msdn.microsoft.com/ietestcenter/#perfPaintNotification looks > like a good start, but it seems a bit out of date (for example it tests for > a animationStartTime property that has never existed in a W3C spec).**** > > ** ** > > - James**** > > ** ** > > **** > > Thanks,**** > > Jatinder**** > > ** ** >
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 02:44:05 UTC