- From: Sigbjørn Vik <sigbjorn@opera.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:50:40 +0200
- To: public-web-perf@w3.org
On Thu, 26 Apr 2012 00:21:02 +0200, Jatinder Mann <jmann@microsoft.com> wrote: > c. Navigation Timing 2 > > The working group decided to take Section 4.4 of Performance Timeline > out of the Performance Timeline spec and into a Navigation Timing 2 > speak. Further, the additions that Jatinder suggested to include > PerformanceNavigationTiming will be added to Navigation Timing 2. > Jatinder has ACTION 102: Move the data from Section 4.4 in > PerformanceTimeline and add the PerformanceNavigationTiming entry into > Navigation Timing 2 spec. This leaves me with a few questions. What is/was section 4.4 of the Performance Timeline? What are the additions that Jatinder suggested? What is the rationale behind this move? It seems we have enough micro-specs already, we don't need any more, and I am not sure I see how this improves the specs. > b. Performance Timeline to CR > > As there has not been any feedback or open issues on the remaining > Performance Timeline sections for quite some time now, the working group > would like to move this spec to CR. Philippe will review the mailing > list and ensure nothing is missed. Are we certain that the recent change to the spec (see above) is for the best? There should at least be a fair chance to discuss the change before moving to CR. -- Sigbjørn Vik Core Quality Services Opera Software
Received on Friday, 27 April 2012 15:51:23 UTC