- From: Jason Weber <jweber@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 23:34:54 +0000
- To: Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <5CD0D8C512B91B45A7E5CCD39EBB9A3405AB867D@CH1PRD0310MB380.namprd03.prod.outlook.>
I agree with the sentiment that we may not need to meet in person this year. Our first three F2F working group meetings established the focus areas for the working group, and we're making good progress against those deliverables and respective implementations. I'm not aware of any open issues that would benefit from a larger F2F, and I recommend we be cautious about expanding the charter until we've finished our current set of deliverables. I suggest we next get together once the timing related features are interoperably implemented across browsers. Thoughts? From: Arvind Jain [mailto:arvind@google.com] Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 9:34 PM To: public-web-perf Subject: Face to face this year We took a vote in our WG meeting on whether we'd like to meet face to face at TPAC this year, and there wasn't much enthusiasm. Steve Souders offered an alternative - would the WG like to meet face to face at the Velocity Conference venue this year (June 25-27 Santa Clara CA) - we may get a room for us, and it'd be a chance for WG members to attend Velocity along with our face to face. As usual, we can telecon/VC folks who can't attend. Please let me know what you think of it. Arvind
Received on Tuesday, 24 April 2012 23:36:44 UTC