RE: HAR vs Nav timings

I will add this to next week's agenda. 

Jatinder

-----Original Message-----
From: Arvind Jain [mailto:arvind@google.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 10:50 AM
To: Steve Souders
Cc: Ricardo Oliveira; honza@softwareishard.com; public-web-perf@w3.org
Subject: Re: HAR vs Nav timings

Let's discuss this next week when Jan and Steve will join the call.

On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com> wrote:
> We'll discuss this in our next telecon.
>
> Arvind
>
> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Steve Souders <souders@google.com> wrote:
>> This would be a nice addition to the Web Timing specs (nav & resource).
>> Resource timing info is necessary to output a worthwhile HAR file.
>>
>> -Steve
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We have not communicated with them. Adding Steve and Jan for their 
>>> comments.
>>>
>>> Arvind
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Ricardo Oliveira 
>>> <rvelosoo@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Just wondering if there has been any communication between the w3c 
>>> > nav timings folks and the HAR spec folks?
>>> > http://www.softwareishard.com/blog/har-12-spec/
>>> >
>>> > it seems every browser has its own way of exporting an HAR file, 
>>> > often requiring add-ons, would be nice to :
>>> >
>>> > + have a js native call that would return an har formatted doc 
>>> > + standardize the HAR output among different browsers
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> >
>>> > --Ricardo
>>> >
>>> > ThousandEyes.com
>>
>>

Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2011 18:53:52 UTC