- From: Jason Weber <jweber@microsoft.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2011 20:51:16 +0000
- To: Alex Russell <slightlyoff@google.com>, Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com>
- CC: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>, Tony Gentilcore <tonyg@google.com>
I completely agree we need to improve the reporting around framerates. I've been thinking about this in the context of the proposed "Display Paint Notifications" specification. If the web application receives a callback when the painting needs to occur instead of arbitrarily based on timers, then the web application can accurately keep track of framerate while also having the ability to scale down the framerate as needed to provide a great experience even on lower end hardware. I prefer the callback approach over a reporting API since it puts the web developer in control over the framerates and experience. -----Original Message----- From: public-web-perf-request@w3.org [mailto:public-web-perf-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Alex Russell Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2011 10:59 AM To: Arvind Jain Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret; public-web-perf; Tony Gentilcore Subject: Re: *Proposed* Web Performance Working Group Charter I'd like to see some metrics reported about frame rates. On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 9:21 AM, Arvind Jain <arvind@google.com> wrote: > Are there any other deliverables that we should add to the charter > besides these 3 new deliverables (Page Visibility, Efficient Script > Yielding, and Display Paint Notifications)? If you'd like to add anything, > please suggest them here (by next Tuesday). > Thanks, > Arvind > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> As agreeing on Wednesday, here are the proposed changes that Arvind, >> Jason and I are proposing. You can find them highlighted in >> http://www.w3.org/2011/02/webperf.html >> >> Plan to get this reviewed by the membership starting next week or the >> week after while we start the work in the group. >> >> Regards, >> >> Philippe >> >> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 20:51:53 UTC