- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 11:53:15 +0200
- To: public-web-perf <public-web-perf@w3.org>, "Philippe Le Hegaret" <plh@w3.org>
On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 17:52:02 +0200, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote:
> At the moment, we have:
> [[
> [Supplemental]
> interface Window {
> [Replaceable] readonly attribute Performance performance;
> };
> ]]
>
> with the new WebIDL spec, i think it would become:
> [[
> [NoInterfaceObject]
> interface WindowPerformance {
> [Replaceable] readonly attribute Performance performance;
> };
>
> Window implements WindowPerformance;
> ]]
>
> While I'm at it, should PerformanceTiming inherits from
> PerformanceEntryList instead of PerformanceEntry?
If performance does not need to be exposed in Web Workers you can simply
use
partial interface Window {
...
}
rather than the whole convoluted thing with [NoInterfaceObject], custom
name, and implements.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2011 09:53:44 UTC