Hi, Philippe, Yes, it's depending on the implementation of the user agent and other parts of the system, e.g., networking stacks. cheers, Zhiheng On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 12:18 -0800, Zhiheng Wang wrote: > > Thanks for the heads-up. The text is fixed by now. > > Closing the loop on this one. The new text says: > > [[ > This interface does not include an attribute to represent the completion > of sending the request, e.g., requestEnd. > > * Completion of sending the request from the user agent does not > always indicate the corresponding completion time in the network > transport, which brings most of the benefit of having such an > attribute. > * Some user agents have high cost to determine the actual > completion time of sending the request due to the HTTP layer > encapsulation. > ]] > > So, in other words, it is implementation dependent. Correct? > > Philippe > > > On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:18 AM, Arthur Barstow > > <art.barstow@nokia.com> wrote: > > > > On Jan/13/2011 11:14 AM, ext Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: > > I received the following feedback in my inbox: > > [[ > > Re the following "Note" in the definition of the > > requestStart attribute: > > > > [[ > > requestStart is prior to checking HTTP cache. > > ]] > > > > Does "is prior" mean "is set prior ..."? > > > > Also, seems like this text should be normative i.e. > > something that > > should be test-able. > > ]] > > > > I agree that the text could be better but the Note > > seems already > > normative to me. > > Seems like the "notes in this specification are non-normative" > > part of Section 2 implies the Note in the requestStart > > definition would apply. > > > > -AB > > > > > > > > > > >Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 19:31:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:01:06 UTC