- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 01:06:59 -0500
- To: James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>
- CC: public-web-perf@w3.org
On 12/7/11 12:59 AM, James Robinson wrote: > Either sound fine to me. The goal is to attempt some sort of symmetry > with setTimeout/clearTimeout and setInterval/clearInterval. I'm not > sure if "request"/"cancel" are an ideal pair but I didn't come up with > the "request" bit in the first place :). If we have a better name, we should consider it now, before implementations start unprefixing. Content that was trying to be forward-compatible with the unprefixed name will need to be changed, of course, but it all has fallbacks to setTimeout anyway, so it won't fail catastrophically. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 06:07:38 UTC