W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-perf@w3.org > August 2011

Re: [RequestAnimationFrame] Processing model defined

From: John Resig <jeresig@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:52:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJXLSTBFxfRh9fW44CPz5Sv2rG2yyYu72n7r0qKAvxEXy5wmnw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Cc: Paul Bakaus <pbakaus@zynga.com>, James Robinson <jamesr@google.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
Yeah, we've just backed out requestAnimationFrame:

And hope to get it back in soon (in a working state, naturally).


On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:16 AM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu> wrote:

> On 8/25/11 6:37 AM, Paul Bakaus wrote:
>> Happy to help wherever I can. While I'm not actively involved in the
>> jQuery project any more, I can help with reviewing animation proposals. I
>> started jQuery UI and wrote the animation extensions for it.
>> For the current implementation of animate(), I've cc'ed John Resig. John,
>> do you see a feasible way of "upgrading" animate() to use
>> requestAnimationFrame?
> The issue is that it's already been thus "upgraded" but in a way that
> causes problems...
> -Boris
Received on Monday, 29 August 2011 20:53:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:01:09 UTC