On 8/17/11 2:22 AM, James Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 11:13 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu > <mailto:bzbarsky@mit.edu>> wrote: > Or put another way, we _do_ want jQuery to build animate() on top of > requestAnimationFrame and we do _not_ want to break the huge amount > of deployed content that's using animate() and was perfectly fine > with the behavior it used to have. The question is how animate() > can implement the behavior it used to have on top of > requestAnimationFrame. > > That's a good way to put it. One counterargument is that jQuery (or > other authors) could implement the behavior you describe with a > combination of requestAnimationFrame, page visibility, and timers. Maybe we should start by contacting the jQuery folks then.... (Sorry for the lag; I was on vacation.) -BorisReceived on Wednesday, 24 August 2011 05:13:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 18:01:09 UTC