- From: Zhiheng Wang <zhihengw@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:36:13 -0700
- To: Jason Sobel <jsobel@facebook.com>
- Cc: Bryan McQuade <bmcquade@google.com>, "public-web-perf@w3.org" <public-web-perf@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <AANLkTinR_YQOgtouVQSgYN1MM2ndzTvTPMdeGZiwD_J_@mail.gmail.com>
I actually did mean "HTML header". :-) HTTP header requires changes to the http server configure, which is not always feasible for developers. thanks, Zhiheng On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Jason Sobel <jsobel@facebook.com> wrote: > I assume you mean an HTTP header? If so, that sounds totally reasonable. > > Thanks! > > > > --jason > > > > *From:* Zhiheng Wang [mailto:zhihengw@google.com] > *Sent:* Tuesday, August 24, 2010 1:21 PM > *To:* Jason Sobel > *Cc:* Bryan McQuade; public-web-perf@w3.org > *Subject:* Re: Resource Timing > > > > fbcdn.net can set its html header, say "allow-timing-access", to allow > facebook.com to access timing information on those resources > > served from it. That should answer your question? > > > > cheers, > > Zhiheng > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Jason Sobel <jsobel@facebook.com> wrote: > > The case I'm mostly worried about is where we (facebook.com) host our > static resources on a different domain (fbcdn.net). I'd like some way to > allow fbcdn.net to "opt in" to giving timing information to facebook.com. > At one point CORS (http://www.w3.org/TR/cors/) was mentioned as a possible > solution. > > I look forward to seeing what you come up with Zhiheng. Thanks! > > --jason > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bryan McQuade [mailto:bmcquade@google.com] > Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 12:32 PM > To: Zhiheng Wang > Cc: Jason Sobel; public-web-perf@w3.org > Subject: Re: Resource Timing > > Interesting. Can you expand on the meta header approach? > > I assume you are referring to a case where a child iframe is on a > different origin. In that case it would not be appropriate to leak the > timing info for the frame up to the parent. But it sounds like this > meta header might allow the child frame to give permission to leak the > info to the parent? > > On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Zhiheng Wang <zhihengw@google.com> > wrote: > > The immediate questions for ResourceTiming is how to maintain privacy > > while exposing those timing information. > > So far using meta header on top of the same origin policy seems to be the > > way to start. An update should be available > > later this week. > > cheers, > > Zhiheng > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Jason Sobel <jsobel@facebook.com> > wrote: > >> > >> Hey all- > >> > >> Looks like you're making great progress on navigation timing -- very > >> exciting! > >> > >> > >> > >> Do you have any thoughts on polishing and implementing resource timing? > >> That data is very interesting to us at Facebook so I'm hoping it will be > >> available in all the major browsers sooner rather than later. > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks much! > >> > >> > >> > >> --jason > >> > >> > > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2010 20:36:44 UTC