- From: Soumya Kanti Datta <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 18:36:56 +0530
- To: "Bassbouss, Louay" <louay.bassbouss@fokus.fraunhofer.de>
- Cc: Thomas Amberg <tamberg@yaler.net>, "public-web-of-things@w3.org" <public-web-of-things@w3.org>, Rob van Kranenburg <kranenbu@xs4all.nl>
- Message-ID: <56C1CD70.8050001@eurecom.fr>
Nice article Louay. Google chrome translated it for me :-) . BR, Soumya Research Engineer, EURECOM, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010 https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta On 15-02-2016 18:00, Bassbouss, Louay wrote: > Last year we published an article about Physical Web and the different > mechanisms to broadcast URLs on heise.de <http://heise.de> [1]: x The > Article is in German if you wish the englisch version please let me know. > Please note that Physical Web can use other mechanisms and > technologies than Eddystone/BLE-Beacon in the future to broadcast > URLs. mDNS and SSDP are already discussed in the Project [2]. > > [1]: > http://www.heise.de/developer/artikel/Einfuehrung-in-das-Physical-Web-2919078.html > [2]: https://github.com/google/physical-web#contents > > thx, > Louay >> On 12 Feb 2016, at 18:38, Soumya Kanti Datta >> <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr >> <mailto:Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>> wrote: >> >> Dear Thomas, >> Thanks for sharing the good news. In TF-DI we have studied the >> UriBeacon. It is a good input for our tech landscape study. >> >> BR, >> Soumya >> >> Research Engineer, EURECOM, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010 >> https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta >> >> On 12-02-2016 20:45, Thomas Amberg wrote: >>> http://techcrunch.com/2016/02/11/google-chrome-for-android-will-soon-support-interactions-with-bluetooth-beacons/ >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Thomas >>> >>>> On 27 Nov 2014, at 18:31, Thomas Amberg <tamberg@yaler.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> just to clarify: anybody could build a "browser" for the proposed >>>> UriBeacon format. >>>> >>>> Relying on URIs makes the approach more generic, distributed and >>>> open than iBeacon (where apps "resolve" IDs). >>>> >>>> But, as Rob says, when it comes to prioritise the "search" result >>>> list of URIs in your proximity, the browser with most context info >>>> available probably wins. >>>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Thomas >>>> >>>>> On 27 Nov 2014, at 11:56, Rob van Kranenburg <kranenbu@xs4all.nl> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I had a talk on that with >>>>> Charalampos Doukas >>>>> Thomas Amberg >>>>> https://twitter.com/tamberg >>>>> https://twitter.com/BuildingIoT >>>>> >>>>> on this latest Google initiative: trailing on urls for objects >>>>> >>>>> https://github.com/google/physical-web/blob/master/documentation/technical_overview.md >>>>> >>>>> and we realized that as you assign your device through the >>>>> (bluetooth) beacon you are effectively adding these devices to the >>>>> Google web. So if you go out to a friend you will see their >>>>> devices. But in what order? Who prioritizes the devices, according >>>>> to which criteria? Google ads! :)- the relevant sorting. Maybe you >>>>> have to pay for being shown all devices on the discovery list? >>>>> >>>>> So dangerous and yet so alluring to developers, just assign urls >>>>> to objects. >>>>> >>>>> The idea itself is good. >>>>> >>>>> Thomas says: you as a user will help them catalogue the devices — >>>>> location >>>>> >>>>> But what if the list goes to an open and public initiative? It >>>>> should not feed into Google of course. >>>>> >>>>> Then you could walk around and feed your local internet of >>>>> neighborhoods, >>>>> >>>>> Greetings, Rob >>>>> >>>>> Rob van Kranenburg 罗万魁 >>>>> Founder of Council; theinternetofthings.eu >>>>> Community Manager; sociotal.eu >>>>> Chair of Activity Chain 8 Societal of the IERC; >>>>> www.internet-of-things-research.eu >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Op 27-nov.-2014, om 02:15 heeft 전종홍 <hollobit@etri.re.kr> het >>>>>> volgende geschreven: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi All, >>>>>> >>>>>> FYI - Google Reveals ‘The Physical Web,’ A Project To Make >>>>>> Internet Of Things Interaction App-Less. >>>>>> >>>>>> How about to consider it in the scope of WoT IG. >>>>>> >>>>>> http://techcrunch.com/2014/10/02/google-the-physical-web/ >>>>>> https://google.github.io/physical-web/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Best Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> --- Jonathan Jeon >> >> >
Received on Monday, 15 February 2016 13:06:43 UTC