- From: Soumya Kanti Datta <Soumya-Kanti.Datta@eurecom.fr>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 23:08:15 +0530
- To: Thomas Amberg <tamberg@yaler.net>
- Cc: "public-web-of-things@w3.org" <public-web-of-things@w3.org>, Rob van Kranenburg <kranenbu@xs4all.nl>
Dear Thomas, Thanks for sharing the good news. In TF-DI we have studied the UriBeacon. It is a good input for our tech landscape study. BR, Soumya Research Engineer, EURECOM, France | +33658194342 | @skdatta2010 https://sites.google.com/site/skdunfolded | Skype id: soumyakantidatta On 12-02-2016 20:45, Thomas Amberg wrote: > http://techcrunch.com/2016/02/11/google-chrome-for-android-will-soon-support-interactions-with-bluetooth-beacons/ > > Kind regards, > Thomas > >> On 27 Nov 2014, at 18:31, Thomas Amberg <tamberg@yaler.net> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> just to clarify: anybody could build a "browser" for the proposed UriBeacon format. >> >> Relying on URIs makes the approach more generic, distributed and open than iBeacon (where apps "resolve" IDs). >> >> But, as Rob says, when it comes to prioritise the "search" result list of URIs in your proximity, the browser with most context info available probably wins. >> >> Kind regards, >> Thomas >> >>> On 27 Nov 2014, at 11:56, Rob van Kranenburg <kranenbu@xs4all.nl> wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I had a talk on that with >>> Charalampos Doukas >>> Thomas Amberg >>> https://twitter.com/tamberg >>> https://twitter.com/BuildingIoT >>> >>> on this latest Google initiative: trailing on urls for objects >>> >>> https://github.com/google/physical-web/blob/master/documentation/technical_overview.md >>> >>> and we realized that as you assign your device through the (bluetooth) beacon you are effectively adding these devices to the Google web. So if you go out to a friend you will see their devices. But in what order? Who prioritizes the devices, according to which criteria? Google ads! :)- the relevant sorting. Maybe you have to pay for being shown all devices on the discovery list? >>> >>> So dangerous and yet so alluring to developers, just assign urls to objects. >>> >>> The idea itself is good. >>> >>> Thomas says: you as a user will help them catalogue the devices — location >>> >>> But what if the list goes to an open and public initiative? It should not feed into Google of course. >>> >>> Then you could walk around and feed your local internet of neighborhoods, >>> >>> Greetings, Rob >>> >>> Rob van Kranenburg 罗万魁 >>> Founder of Council; theinternetofthings.eu >>> Community Manager; sociotal.eu >>> Chair of Activity Chain 8 Societal of the IERC; www.internet-of-things-research.eu >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> Op 27-nov.-2014, om 02:15 heeft 전종홍 <hollobit@etri.re.kr> het volgende geschreven: >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> FYI - Google Reveals ‘The Physical Web,’ A Project To Make Internet Of Things Interaction App-Less. >>>> >>>> How about to consider it in the scope of WoT IG. >>>> >>>> http://techcrunch.com/2014/10/02/google-the-physical-web/ >>>> https://google.github.io/physical-web/ >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> >>>> --- Jonathan Jeon
Received on Friday, 12 February 2016 17:38:06 UTC