Re: Bootstrapping the Web of Things Community Group

I think Webid and rww segments have beneficially related works.  thoughts consider accounts, management, acl/WAC and app paradigms to define integration patterns between IoT / WoT and semantic web use-cases.

The WebID spec currently use (in most functional examples) foaf records, when perhaps the foaf records could be linked to IoT / WoT document or uri expressed in a x.509 certs, and/or other IoT /  WoT documents referencing back to foaf documents.

Foaf appears to express the description of a person (or persona / account of a person), whereas we use devices to access those records; and therein, will be a chain of "IoT / WoT" enabled devices, related back to the expressly defined function carried out for (a) person/(s) (account or role; or foaf/doap/sioc, etc). RWW provides a means to manage the data (ie: data.fm)

Timh.

> On 22 Jan 2014, at 11:07 pm, Xiang Su <xiang.su@ee.oulu.fi> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I agree with Markus that Coap is clearly cornerstone for WoT. This is already standardized by IETF, we should always try to use ready standardized work  when possible in development of WoT apps.
> 
> What more we could do in this group? The general version of "Web of things" is to reuse/adapt web technologies for building application and services for "things". While underlying communication issues are being solved, it's important to think about how to realize full potential of Web technologies. integrating and interoperating huge amounts of information provided by things is important.
> 
> It's interesting to study best ways to adapt Web architecture principles, protocols, identifications, meta formats, etc for WoT. OGC SensorThings API is an important effort, and new W3C recommendation JSON-LD (http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-json-ld-20140116/) is also an interesting format for WoT. 
> 
> Another thing is semantics, how to enable sensors/actuators as data sources of linked data is a challenge. Can ready W3C languages, including OWL ontologies, SPARQL, RIF or SWRL reasoning languages be used in WoT straightforwardly? We need to think how to take benefits from these.
> 
> Moreover, it important to enjoy the benefit of Web technologies and semantics, without breaking the constraints on resource usage. In our group, we also study resource consumptions, e.g. usage of processor, memory, bandwidth, and energy in WoT applications. 
> 
> br,
> -Xiang
> 
>> On 20.1.2014 15:39, Markus.Isomaki@nokia.com wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>  
>> One very “Web of Things” oriented effort, that I have not seen mentioned on this list before, is the standardization of the Constrained Application Protocol (CoAP) in the IETF, see http://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/core/charter/ and http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-core-coap/.
>>  
>> CoAP is an application protocol that supports the RESTful CRUD methods similar to HTTP (in practice GET, PUT, DELETE and POST), but in a more lightweight manner. For instance, it runs over UDP (and DTLS for security), and is binary encoded. In addition to the baseline protocol, some of the related infrastructure, such as resource directories, mirror proxies etc. are being standardized. The idea is that CoAP is so compact, that it fits nicely on top of IP even on the most constrained radio links, such as Zigbee or Bluetooth Low Energy. Otherwise all the normal Web design principles apply.
>>  
>> I don’t know how far the Community Group effort will go, but it would be certainly interesting to get CoAP JS API standardized, so that it could be supported in browsers or web apps, for instance.
>>  
>> You can find the contact details of the active CoAP people from the CoRE WG pages, including chairs and draft authors. Carsten Bormann, Cullen Jennings (WG chairs) and Zach Shelby (base protocol main author) good candidates, for instance.
>>  
>> There is also IP for Smart Objects (IPSO) Alliance, http://www.ipso-alliance.org/, an industry group dedicated to the promotion of IP/Internet and Web technologies for “smart objects”. Geoff Mulligan is the chair.
>>  
>> Regards,
>>                 Markus
>>  
>>  
>> From: ext Dave Raggett [mailto:dsr@w3.org] 
>> Sent: 17 January, 2014 18:54
>> To: public-web-of-things@w3.org
>> Subject: Bootstrapping the Web of Things Community Group
>>  
>> The group has been very quiet until now, and I would like to get things moving, especially, as we want your help with the planning the W3C Web of Things Workshop to be held this June somewhere in Europe.  The dates and location are still to be decided. Please let us have your ideas!
>> 
>> 
>> The aim of the workshop will be to discuss opportunities for standardization as a basis for interoperability and a thriving ecosystem. To support that we will be looking for examples of use cases, and analyses of requirements and architectures, as well as implementation experiences. Please help us to frame the scope of the workshop in more detail.
>> 
>> Which people/organizations should we invite to become part of the workshop's program committee?
>> 
>> Send your comments to the Web of Things Community Group mailing list
>> 
>>  *  public-web-of-things@w3.org
>> 
>> Please note that note that everyone on the older list (public-wot) have been moved over to the above list. Newcomers to the Web of Things Community Group will be automatically subscribed to the above mailing list.
>> 
>> Looking forward to working with you all.
>> 
>> -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
>