- From: Giorgio Basile <giorgio.basile4@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 18:53:20 +0100
- To: Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>, "public-web-of-things@w3.org" <public-web-of-things@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAH+kj7-iZwLFZJHsBqVcJM568A7o3spg0vAU4oDFd5f41U9=2A@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, I'd like to suggest you the Semantic Web of Things page of the Information System Research Lab of Technical Univeristy of Bari, were I'm an intern. http://sisinflab.poliba.it/swottools/ We're working on semantic web-based prototypes for IoT, aiming to develop the WoT vision. Every project has a dedicated page. Cheers. Giorgio On 17 January 2014 18:38, Timothy Holborn <timothy.holborn@gmail.com> wrote: > http://hbbtv.org/ provides HybridTV standards, likely important for > economic chains. A related project called Dtv4all researched usability / > accessibility. > > Secondly, energy consumption. Wether it be smart grid related "things" or > ways in which the net can store stuff more efficiently or the way we > collect environmental data (perhaps relating to some traditional "public > data" spheres. > > Ontological info is important for building out rww-ldp, managing privacy, > connected devices and interesting new apps. > > Will respond with more ideas in the near future. > > I think rww-ldp accounts will play a big role, perhaps as one form of > implementation. I've got questions over the role of an x509v3 cert based > webid (connected to a foaf uri) vs. methodologies that are more inclusive > of WoT. > > Data.fm (etc.) provide a working platform to start developing data spaces > and apps, which can provide a useful online interface for "things that > speak" WoT. > > Are there some rdf ontologies you can point me to? > > Also: Web of T(rust/hings) is confusing. Given trust relies upon things, > do we need both as separate works? There's also IoT which seemed to > mitigate that problem, but still... > > Cheers. > > Timh. > > Sent from my iPad > > On 18 Jan 2014, at 4:06 am, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On 17 January 2014 17:54, Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> wrote: > >> The group has been very quiet until now, and I would like to get things >> moving, especially, as we want your help with the planning the W3C Web of >> Things Workshop to be held this June somewhere in Europe. The dates and >> location are still to be decided. Please let us have your ideas! >> >> The aim of the workshop will be to discuss opportunities for >> standardization as a basis for interoperability and a thriving ecosystem. >> To support that we will be looking for examples of use cases, and analyses >> of requirements and architectures, as well as implementation experiences. >> Please help us to frame the scope of the workshop in more detail. >> >> Which people/organizations should we invite to become part of the >> workshop's program committee? >> > > In terms of invitees, how about: > > https://allseenalliance.org/ > > >> Send your comments to the Web of Things Community Group mailing list >> >> * public-web-of-things@w3.org >> >> Please note that note that everyone on the older list (public-wot) have >> been moved over to the above list. Newcomers to the Web of Things Community >> Group will be automatically subscribed to the above mailing list. >> >> Looking forward to working with you all. >> -- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> <dsr@w3.org> >> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett >> > >
Received on Saturday, 18 January 2014 22:17:12 UTC