- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 09:18:44 +0100
- To: Jon Lee <jonlee@apple.com>
- Cc: Web Notification WG <public-web-notification@w3.org>, "Ted O'Connor" <eoconnor@apple.com>, Peter Beverloo <beverloo@google.com>
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 8:45 PM, Jon Lee <jonlee@apple.com> wrote: > At this point, this spec descriptively documents what’s already been implemented and shipped in browsers. That in no way obstructs progress on the WHATWG’s work, which appears to focus on persistent, service worker based notifications. This WG’s spec, in accordance with the charter, only covers notifications from a locally running web app. The two specs have different use cases, so there’s no reason for them to be in direct conflict. In fact, there are native platforms that have APIs for both local and push notifications, including OS X and iOS. So the specs are not incompatible, and there’s no obvious reason we can’t do both. “Someone else is doing something different but somewhat related” is not a valid argument to stop our work. Apparently you have still not been reading my comments. The WHATWG supports both persistent and "toast-like" notifications (the latter through new Notification()), but has removed a number of events. The WHATWG has also simplified the processing model somewhat. > There were no objections by the members of the working group. To be formal about it, we have unanimity, which is stronger than consensus, and I have a hard time seeing what else to do other than respect the group’s unanimity here and declare consensus. Actually, you have to address substantive comments. Whether you recognize them coming from members of your WG (which I thought were organizations, not individuals) or as members of the public. -- https://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2015 08:19:11 UTC