W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-notification@w3.org > August 2013

Re: Recent changes, and getting to Last Call

From: Jon Lee <jonlee@apple.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2013 09:43:00 -0700
Message-id: <219030D7-1B84-46E2-B687-7FFEC341AB25@apple.com>
To: WG <public-web-notification@w3.org>
Hello folks,

Hearing no objections, Iíve asked Ted to merge these changes into the spec.


On Aug 7, 2013, at 12:33 AM, Jon Lee <jonlee@apple.com> wrote:

> Hello everyone,
> So I believe issues in recent threads have been addressed, and I wanted to make another call to reach consensus to get to LC. But before I do that I wanted to bring up one last batch of changes that have been added to the WHATWG spec since we last tried to get to LC, and to determine whether we should consider them for this version of the spec. Iíve listed them here:
> 1) Make it possible to inspect a Notification's properties
> https://github.com/whatwg/notifications/commit/b7f3cc1b8c30322ce3f5718f05d3051e75e1edc4
> 2) Use URL for parsing and serializing URLs
> https://github.com/whatwg/notifications/commit/dd39ee473599b5fabf1a8e935363dd99e8832d1f
> 3) Normative words in the Introduction and nobody noticed.
> https://github.com/whatwg/notifications/commit/998421f2a3d767520bc51801173b8a7a05bb6a52
> 4) Support multiple Notification objects per notification. And a way to get active notifications.
> https://github.com/whatwg/notifications/commit/fef62bf8755a4b47ac5c2d212b8187f07e8b70c9
> (Switching hats) I propose merging the first three. 1) adds implementation requirements, but is small enough I think it is reasonable to take for this version of the spec. 2) references the URL spec, and 3) cleans a couple things up. As for 4), since this new capability utilizes promises, I think this is out of scope for v1, but is worth discussing for a v2 of the spec.
> Any thoughts on this proposal?
> Thanks,
> Jon
Received on Tuesday, 13 August 2013 16:43:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:53:14 UTC