- From: Andrew Wilson <atwilson@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 14:16:30 +0100
- To: Steven Verbeek <dubcanada@gmail.com>
- Cc: public-web-notification <public-web-notification@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAArhhist4rc18gc8h-zE30YUH5=a1VF1vVPmZe+31JVx1r=ASQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Steven Verbeek <dubcanada@gmail.com> wrote: > Are the benefits of having an icon really that important that we as > willing to have a fragmented API? > > Again, we've already discussed the fact that not every platform will support all aspects of the API. I would strongly urge you to review the archives if you'd like to understand the arguments already presented. As far as I can tell, there is no new argument being presented here, other than "unsupported functionality is fine for other platforms, but not for ${MY_FAVORITE_PLATFORM}", so there's no reason to reopen the spec at this stage. I'd like to further point out that the spec already explicitly acknowledges that a given notification platform may not support icons, so this is not an unexpected development. For example, in section 5, where the description of the Notification() constructor procedure is enumerated: 9. *If the notification platform supports icons*, the user agent may start fetching<http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/fetching-resources.html#fetch> notification's icon URL <http://www.w3.org/TR/notifications/#icon-url> at this point. > The some flavours of Linux are expected, even things like drag and drop > support don't work on every single Linux. And Mac is probably only like 5% > of the community, however windows users have never experienced > notifications like those before. > > I kind of end to agree with apple when a notification comes in for a > website, and I'm not focused on the browser. Does it make sense to show > some random icon or the browser. I uses for gmail it may make sense to show > the gmail icon, but what if you have the gmail application on your > computer. Now your really confused. > > I could not find the thread you are asking about, could you link me? > > Steve > > On 2012-11-19, at 5:41 AM, Andrew Wilson <atwilson@google.com> wrote: > > We've had discussions about this in the past, and the consensus we arrived > at was that we should not remove functionality from the API > to accommodate the limitations of a single platform. For example, the > notification system on some flavors of Linux do not support clicking on > notifications, and yet we continue to support adding onclick handlers to > the notifications. > > Please also review previous discussions on the list re: accessibility and > icons, as I think they apply in this case as well (the value of providing > an icon in the API even though not all platforms may support it). > > > On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Dub <dubcanada@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hey Guys, >> >> According to Notification Center you cannot pass a custom icon to the >> notification center, it will show the icon of the application making the >> notification. >> >> That being said, I believe we should remove the icon from the >> notification draft, unless we can convince Apple to add in the ability to >> specific custom icons, this isn't possible to do on Mac 10.8+ >> >> - Steve >> > >
Received on Monday, 19 November 2012 13:17:01 UTC