- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 13:16:22 +0200
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>
- Cc: John Gregg <johnnyg@google.com>, Web Notification WG <public-web-notification@w3.org>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:39:48 +0200, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl> > wrote: >> We could introduce an event named "iconerror" if we think it's worth >> it. Dispatching events with other names is rather trivial. > > That's one approach. Doing that, and going through with the rest of the > notification is probably a good idea in practice. Discussing this a bit with James I agree we should display the notification. The icon is like the favicon for pages. It's not a critical resource, just there for entertainment. I think we should remove the event altogether. We do not have events for favicons either. We can always introduce an event later on if it turns out failing images is a huge problem people want to be able to debug more easily than by prefetching the image first. > Hmm. There's no way to provide a text equivalent to the icon. If it is > possible to display the notification without the icon, as I think it should > be, then that becomes a bug. I can raise a seperate thread for that if you > like... It doesn't need it. -- Anne — Opera Software http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Thursday, 21 June 2012 11:16:50 UTC