- From: Navarr Barnier <navarr@gtaero.net>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 16:42:40 -0400
- To: Web Notification WG <public-web-notification@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <BANLkTi=ShPtUhhn1kUqEkh6QbB2iDS_Ntw@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:29 PM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 20:22:15 +0200, Navarr Barnier <navarr@gtaero.net> > wrote: > >> My thought is, if its possible we should push it forward. One thing that >> no longer seems to be addressed in the spec, however, is *web >> notifications*. >> Are we dropping them completely? They are only referred to in the >> definition list of the specification now. >> > > Do you mean URL-based notifications? Because "web notifications" we now use > as a term for notifications usable by the web platform. > > > > -- > Anne van Kesteren > http://annevankesteren.nl/ > The spec defines a "web notification" as a notification with consisting of web platform content such as HTML and SVG, where as our current "Web Notification" spec defines a "Simple Notification." On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:21 PM, John Gregg <johnnyg@google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 9:35 AM, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com> > wrote: > >> Apart from the "may ignore markup" issue not a single email was sent to >> this list while I was away. Should we fix that and go to Last Call or take >> it as a cue that maybe it is too early to standardize these APIs given the >> lack of comments? I'm personally leaning towards the former. If it turns out >> it does not get adopted by implementors in the end we can always drop it >> then and it has been implemented already in some implementations. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> > I would support going to Last Call on the spec; perhaps that will encourage > comments if there are any lingering. > > Regarding Web Notifications, I think the plan is still to maintain a > separate track for that spec; having it mentioned in the definitions of the > Notifications spec makes sense to me for context. If the group is still > interested in pursuing it, we could separately try to resolve the various > points of contention and get that ready for a first public working draft. > > -John > I support this. I think URL Notifications are important for more complex data from web-based applications and platforms. I think I've emailed the list before with a couple use-cases that would make sense for URL Notifications.
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2011 20:43:41 UTC