W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-web-notification@w3.org > February 2011

Re: CfC: FPWD of Web Notification drafts

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 14:17:22 +0100
To: "John Gregg" <johnnyg@google.com>
Cc: "Web Notification WG" <public-web-notification@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vq88i8a464w2qv@anne-van-kesterens-macbook-pro.local>
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 03:57:30 +0100, John Gregg <johnnyg@google.com> wrote:
> As Anne suggested, I have consolidated all the material related to simple
> notifications (text/icon content, not URL content), into one document [
> http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebNotifications/publish/Notifications.html].
>  It now contains the use cases, definitions, requirements, and some new
> language which states web-content notifications are out of scope for the
> document.

Great! In order to publish this document Thursday it needs to conform to  
the W3C pubrules:


Mike Smith (our W3C Team contact) will help out if you do not get around  
to it, but since this needs to happen every time it is probably worth  
doing so we reduce the burden on him. Mike also mentioned on IRC you are  
using a non-JavaScript based version of ReSpec. The ReSpec that is  
actually being maintained is documented here:


(I'm not familiar with ReSpec myself unfortunately but there is a  
spec-prod@w3.org mailing list you could use for questions.)

> I continue to reference the Feature Permissions document for permissions
> material, since this topic was moved to the devices WG (if we would  
> prefer to reincorporate permissions into the Notifications spec for  
> publication, I can make that change as well).

I think that is fine. We should probably take another look at permissions  
and I believe DAP is doing that as well, but for now referencing it works.  
There is no policy against linking to editor's drafts.

Kind regards,

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Monday, 21 February 2011 13:17:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:53:13 UTC