- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 22:03:53 +0200
- To: "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "Drew Wilson" <atwilson@google.com>
- Cc: "Doug Turner" <dougt@dougt.org>, "John Gregg" <johnnyg@google.com>, "Web Notification WG" <public-web-notification@w3.org>
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:25:03 +0200, Drew Wilson <atwilson@google.com> wrote: > I'd be concerned about excluding support for rtl locales merely because > some lowest-common-denominator system platform does not support it, but > I'm > optimistic we can come up with some sort of solution that minimizes > incompatibility. Is there a problem with just stating that the rtl > attribute may not be supported (i.e. ignored) on all system platforms? > In practice, if a user installs a platform that does not support rtl > notifications, then I'm hard-pressed to expect they'll be confused when > that platform doesn't > display rtl notifications. We don't have LTR/RTL indicators for alert() etc. Why are they needed here? -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 13 October 2010 20:04:43 UTC