- From: Reilly Grant via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 01:11:16 +0000
- To: public-web-nfc@w3.org
While I appreciate the desire for a forward-looking design it seems like this discussion is getting off topic. Let's keep the discussion of low-level I/O on #238 and focus on resolving the problem of the current specification's invalid WebIDL definition of the `message` property. The remaining question I have is whether simply defining a `json()` method on an `NDEFRecord` interface is sufficient to resolve the problem @leonhsl is having with the Blink implementation. It seems like it may be invalid to round-trip an arbitrary Javascript object through an interface like this. We may have to explicitly define how the `data` field of input `NDEFRecordInit` is cloned to create the return value of the proposed `json()` method. -- GitHub Notification of comment by reillyeon Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/web-nfc/issues/232#issuecomment-506914841 using your GitHub account
Received on Saturday, 29 June 2019 01:11:17 UTC