- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 18:33:21 -0400
- To: Marcos <marcos@marcosc.com>
- Cc: public-web-mobile@w3.org
Le vendredi 16 mai 2014 à 18:28 -0400, Marcos a écrit : > Just a quick note, there should be a distinction between "access to > camera stream" and "high quality access to camera stream". The current > streams we have access to are great for "RTC", but we currently don't > have access to high (full?) quality streams to build things like > realtime viewfinders in photography apps or AR apps (not to mention > APIs for actually controlling focus, exposure, etc. of cameras). I think there are several "features" hidden in what you describe, all of which have (I think) a spec that currently addresses them: * high quality video streams are available via constraints on getUserMedia (although this is just starting to get implemented) * the viewfinder use cases with additional controls on the camera (incl. autofocus, exposure, preview stream) is what Image Capture is supposed to address http://gmandyam.github.io/image-capture/ ; I think Firefox has an early/incomplete implementation of that spec The latter would definitely deserve to be described as a separate feature in the repo; pull requests welcomed :) Dom > The WebRTC WG needs to address this at some point (can see why it > hasn't been addressed in the current API - but it's a bit sad it > hasn't been yet), and the web is currently missing out on this [very > popular] class of application. > > > >
Received on Tuesday, 20 May 2014 22:33:31 UTC