- From: Dominique Hazael-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:23:10 +0200
- To: Marcos Caceres <w3c@marcosc.com>
- Cc: public-web-mobile@w3.org
Hi Marcos, Le lundi 14 octobre 2013 à 12:01 +0100, Marcos Caceres a écrit : > I think it's great that you've gone to such length to identify the > issues in the platform. However, as it's evident from the breadth of > the problems you've identified, there is a ton of research to be done… > there are probably a couple of PhDs worth. This is a problem for the > IG, as we simply don't have the expertise in the group to try to > address every gap identified in the document. Other problems are > simply outside the scope of a standardization body (anything UX > related). There is a high risk of failure by trying to address every > single gap - it will simply take too long and it's just too dynamic a > space. To be clear, it's never been my goal that we would address all the gaps at once; and not all the gaps are to be addressed by a standardization body for sure either. The goal of taking the wide-picture approach is to make it more likely that when we pick our priorities, we do so with a clearer view; both in terms of what would have the most impact, but also ensuring that closing the said gap won't also affect badly another piece where the Web is leading. I certainly agree that at any time, the IG should focus its efforts in just a few of these items. > Thus, I would like to propose that we try to fix the following three things: > > 1. Offline - there is a real risk that Service Workers will not be > good enough unless we get it in front of the right people early > enough. I strongly agree this should in our top priorities. > 2. Bookmarking - we need to make sure that the bits are in place so > users can "install" web sites. I probably wouldn't call it bookmarking, but I agree that deeper integration of Web apps in the launcher real estate is critical as well. > 3. Permissions - without a permissioning model for the Web, we can't > enable new device capabilities. Well, there is a permissioning model, but it's hard to scale and is pretty leaky; I would love if we can indeed help in this field. Dom
Received on Monday, 14 October 2013 11:23:29 UTC