- From: Ian Dunlop <ianwdunlop@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 10:51:34 +0100
- To: public-web-intents@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAEngrgnX+NUJPa5FY+ho+s_h8aDyy_FZudFNJN91ggVCX5=T_g@mail.gmail.com>
Hello, A colleague and myself were discussing how most web applications suffer from feature creep over time and lose sight of their original design goals. This is generally because the only way to add functionality is to directly integrate it. We realised that an Android style Intent system for the web would help alleviate these issues and then discovered Web Intents. This was then followed by disappointment that the work seemed to have been discontinued already. I have written some of our thoughts here http://dev.mygrid.org.uk/blog/2014/10/you-want-to-do-what-theres-an-app-for-that/ It seems that Web Intents and Web Components are complimentary technologies which would help free developers from the need for their applications to do everything. In the BioJS project (http://biojs.net/) we are developing widgets for life sciences to enable web developers to easily add functionality to their applications. If these could be discovered and installed from an app store as web components with published intents rather than having to be directly integrated with your application then that would make the development process significantly easier. Some people have noted that the original Web Intents design was maybe too complicated ( http://benlog.com/2012/02/09/a-simpler-webbier-approach-to-web-intents-or-activities/) but that doesn't mean that the concept is not valid. A basic cross browser standard for service discovery and invocation would help free us all from the tyranny of integration. I truly believe that Web Intents are far too useful to consign to history. Cheers, Ian
Received on Saturday, 25 October 2014 12:12:23 UTC