RE: [Pick Contacts Intent] ED update

Hi,

I merged Robin's latest changes in the ED of the Pick Contacts Intent. In
this commit, user interaction guideline which described the previous
navigator.contacts interface (find() function and callback) has been
removed. The diff is:
https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/rev/c6b56c18ecba

Jungkee

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jungkee Song [mailto:jungkee.song@samsung.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 9:20 PM
> To: public-device-apis@w3.org; robin@berjon.com; richt@opera.com
> Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com; public-web-intents@w3.org
> Subject: [Pick Contacts Intent] ED update
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I updated ED of the Pick Contacts Intent:
> http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/tip/contacts/Overview.html
> 
> Basically the following two things are incorporated in this update:
> > - Dictionary definition
> >   . Change array typed members to sequence<T>
> >   . Change unnecessary nullable type  to normal type (as a member of
> > dictionary is inherently optional by definition)
> > - Intent action and type string
> >   . action: http://webintents.org/pick to http://intents.w3.org/pick
> >   . type: http://w3.org/type/contact to
> http://intents.w3.org/type/contact
> 
> I did not remove the *ContactIntentExtras* dictionary definition and its
> use
> case. However, we do not have *extra* property in the Intent interface any
> more. I would like to discuss whether we really need the search use case
> so
> that we either drop the capability or talk with Web Intents colleagues how
> to retain the capability.
> 
> Diff: https://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/rev/ec6aa35ffeae
> 
> 
> Jungkee
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jungkee Song [mailto:jungkee.song@samsung.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 2:09 PM
> > To: robin@berjon.com; richt@opera.com
> > Cc: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com; public-device-apis@w3.org
> > Subject: Pick Contacts Intent
> >
> > Hi Robin, Rich and all,
> >
> > As discussed on the last call, I am pleased to volunteer as editor of
> the
> > Pick Contacts Intent. Once agreed, I will start the work by
> incorporating
> > the following changes in the draft:
> >
> > - Dictionary definition
> >   . Change array typed members to sequence<T>
> >   . Change unnecessary nullable type  to normal type (as a member of
> > dictionary is inherently optional by definition)
> >
> > - Intent action and type string
> >   . action: http://webintents.org/pick to http://intents.w3.org/pick
> >   . type: http://w3.org/type/contact to
> http://intents.w3.org/type/contact
> >   . We still need discussion on the type of Pick-* intent, though. [1]
> >
> > - Based on recent discussion, |extras| has been removed from Web Intents
> > spec. [2] Hence, some changes are needed in the way of using
> > ContactIntentExtras. (or maybe we can remove it if that's more
> reasonable.
> > This is the same with MediaIntentExtra of the Pick Media Intent.)
> >
> > Also, apparently, the next step to move Pick-* intents forward is to
> > secure
> > reference services.
> >
> > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-
> > intents/2012Aug/0065.html
> > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-
> > intents/2012Sep/0008.html
> >
> >
> > Jungkee
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com [mailto:Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 05, 2012 9:05 AM
> > >
> > > (1) join the discussion on the WebIntents list [1] , including CfC on
> > > removal of extras [2],  passing origin with explicit intents (and
> > > potential privacy issues), and the SSL discussion.
> > >
> > > As mentioned on the last call we need to think about progressing
> > Contacts
> > > as well.
> > >
> > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-intents/2012Aug/
> (and
> > > Sept)
> > >
> > > [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-
> > > intents/2012Aug/0019.html
>

Received on Monday, 17 September 2012 03:24:11 UTC