- From: Greg Billock <gbillock@google.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 17:57:17 -0700
- To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>
- Cc: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, "public-web-intents@w3.org" <public-web-intents@w3.org>, Harry Halpin <hhalpin@w3.org>
Agreed. I think that'd be a good collection point for these documents. On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 9:53 AM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com> wrote: > I think this is a great idea for an Intent. We should start building out the wiki (http://www.w3.org/wiki/WebIntents) with such ideas (under "Documentation for Web Intents Actions and Types"?). > > I suggest the Intent name be "LoginUsing". > > Thanks, > Bryan Sullivan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Doug Schepers [mailto:schepers@w3.org] > Sent: Sunday, May 06, 2012 2:54 PM > To: public-web-intents@w3.org; Harry Halpin > Subject: New 'Login' Intent? > > Hi, folks- > > Forgive me if this has been discussed before. > > The default intents that I know about are 'Discover', 'Share', 'Edit', > 'View', 'Pick', 'Subscribe', and 'Save'. > > One of the great things about Web Intents is the ability to address the > NASCAR Problem... and one of the worst offenders of that problem is the > identity issue, which is made worse by the fact that it's still not > really a solved problem, so there are likely to be more iterations of > solutions like OpenID Connect (Google, Microsoft, etc.), BrowserID, > Twitter, Facebook Connect, etc. > > I propose that we have another intent, 'Login' (I don't care about the > name... it could be 'SignOn', 'SignIn', 'SelectIdentity', or whatever). > This would let users select from their choice of Identity Providers > (IDPs), or to create or use a bespoke account for that specific site. > > A corollary to this would be 'Comment' or 'Discuss', which is often > hosted by third-party services like Disqus. > > Regards- > -Doug Schepers > W3C Developer Relations > Project Coordinator, SVG, WebApps, Touch Events, and Audio WGs >
Received on Tuesday, 8 May 2012 00:57:47 UTC