- From: Greg Billock <gbillock@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 20:15:36 -0700
- To: Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com
- Cc: glenn.jones@madgex.com, public-web-intents@w3.org
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 1:37 PM, <Frederick.Hirsch@nokia.com> wrote: > How does the user change the preference at a later time if no picker is shown? Is this another implementation-dependent button/UI? That's right -- this kind of tooling is part of the UA's configuration interface. (For Chrome, we currently plan on having a piece of UI that accompanies the service which allows the user to effectively get back to the picker that was skipped. I should say this is in the design stage, as we're just getting our defaults system geared up now.) > regards, Frederick > > Frederick Hirsch > Nokia > > > > On Apr 20, 2012, at 2:25 PM, ext Greg Billock wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 6:55 AM, Glenn Jones <glenn.jones@madgex.com> wrote: >>> Thanks everyone for clearing up my misunderstanding of setDefault. Josh >>> LOL at your response "No no no". >>> >>> The default/suggestions make sense when coupled to a description of how >>> UA logic for displaying the picker works. >>> >>> So to get my use case to work using progressive enhancement, we: >>> 1. Test for window.intents and swap out my four proprietary share >>> buttons for one button that fires the intent >>> 2. Then setup default/suggestions for all four services >>> 3. If the user has already got a registered service the intents UI >>> displays in the picker or goes straight to that option >>> 4. If the user has no registered service the picker will show the >>> four default options >>> 5. Over time UA learns about choices, and the default/suggestions >>> are used less and less. >> >> Yes, yes, and yes. :-) >> >> If the user has a preference, they will experience your share button >> as leading directly to that preference. They will have UA support in >> getting to that state (registering services you suggest or discovering >> others, setting them as default). >> >>> That works for me! - As long I have not got it completely wrong again. >>> >>> Glenn Jones >>> >>> >>> >> >
Received on Wednesday, 2 May 2012 03:16:05 UTC