On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 4:56 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > Hi Cathy, > > On Jun 27, 2012, at 23:41 , <Cathy.Chan@nokia.com> <Cathy.Chan@nokia.com> > wrote: > > I notice that the ContactIntentExtras dictionary contains a fields item > > which is DOMString[]. Meanwhile, the getExtra() method of Intent is > spec'd > > to return a DOMString. > > Whoa, good catch! > > > I suppose it would be necessary to modify the > > getExtra() method to work with the dictionary definition (and to be more > > flexible in general)? Say, returning any instead of DOMString? > > Actually, one thing that we discussed before (and that is pending on > implementers telling us if it's actually possible — Greg had concerns that > there may be issues) was just exposing an |extras| attribute instead of > getExtra(). That attribute would contain all that was provided for extras, > presumably filtered through structured cloning or some such. > > If doable, I personally much prefer that solution. Not to offend anyone, > but using getExtra() to access what is most likely initially provided as an > object literal feels very much Java-ish to me! > > Agreed several times over!! > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > > >
Received on Friday, 29 June 2012 17:00:03 UTC