- From: Michiel de Jong <michiel@unhosted.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2012 19:53:43 +0200
- To: "SULLIVAN, BRYAN L" <bs3131@att.com>
- Cc: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>, "public-device-apis@w3.org public-device-apis@w3.org" <public-device-apis@w3.org>, "public-web-intents@w3.org" <public-web-intents@w3.org>
This is a really cool leap into the future, exciting! One remark though: We should probably compare the format to https://wiki.mozilla.org/WebAPI/ContactsAPI#Proposed_API and vice versa? From an app developer point of view it would be extremely annoying if the two would be almost the same, but different in small ways. A quick glance shows the two are similar, but e.g. 'bday' != 'birthday'. We might want to iron that out? On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 7:37 PM, SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131@att.com> wrote: > Robin, > > I reviewed the spec and have no issue with the terminology and phrasing. I think this is a very valuable start on how to specify Web Intents based APIs. I hope we get to a WD soon so we can begin imitating it! > > Thanks, > Bryan Sullivan > > -----Original Message----- > From: Robin Berjon [mailto:robin@berjon.com] > Sent: Friday, June 22, 2012 9:10 AM > To: public-device-apis@w3.org public-device-apis@w3.org > Cc: public-web-intents@w3.org > Subject: Pick Contacts Intent > > Hi all, > > I've been editing the Contacts API (renamed to "Pick Contacts Intent") in order to make it use Intents. You can read the result here: > > http://w3c-test.org/dap/contacts/ > > Some notes: > > * This is an exploratory exercise, there be dragons, etc. > * I know that there are planned changes to the Contact format that haven't been carried out. I believe Josh was shepherding that. Josh: if you want to send me the changes you had in mind (or make them), go ahead. > * There are a few formatting bugs due to using a bleeding edge ReSpec - please don't report them, I've noticed and will release a fix. > * I haven't updated "Appendix A. User Interaction Guidelines" yet, I will soon (I'll need to make pretty images though). > * The demo I showed you yesterday isn't conforming to this new draft, but it will be once I get around to that. > * Please pay special attention to the terminology and phrasing used to define an Intent-based specification - chances are that this will get copied by others so anything we get wrong will proliferate. > * Some things will change in Web Intents that will break this spec. That's life. > > I'd be interested in knowing how confident people are that this can fly (I think it can). If we like it, I'd like to release a WD soon. > > Have a nice week-end! > > -- > Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon > > >
Received on Friday, 22 June 2012 17:54:13 UTC