- From: James Hawkins <jhawkins@chromium.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 08:33:21 -0700
- To: Gaowenmei <gaowenmei@huawei.com>
- Cc: "public-web-intents@w3.org" <public-web-intents@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAO800SyVQ6NEWLSN6O9fk=Aj6DCGeY00ChJy8fXimBqY5uG7KQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 4:58 AM, Gaowenmei <gaowenmei@huawei.com> wrote: > Thank you, James.**** > > ** ** > > “However it's important to keep in mind that the <intent> tag causes a > web page to be registered as an intent service once the user visits the > page, so in essence the user does have a way to "manually add" a service. > It stretches the definition of 'manually' though, as <intent> tag > registration is designed tob”**** > > ** ** > > --Does it have the same meaning as the first paragraph of section 4 in web > intents spec?**** > > ** ** > > “When the User Agent loads a page with registration markup, it *should* allow > the user to configure that page as a web intents service. The details of > this process is left up to the User Agent. The model is that the page > advises of the ability to handle intents, and the User Agent may remember > that. The User Agent *must not* deliver an intent to a Service discovered > in this way before the user has made a specific action allowing it.”**** > > ** > Yes, "registration markup" in this text means the <intent> tag (if I understand your question correctly). Perhaps we should make this association more explicit. I'm not a fan of the last sentence, however. I'll start a separate thread about that. Thanks, James > ** > > Best Regards**** > > Gao Wenmei**** > > *发件人:* jhawkins@google.com [mailto:jhawkins@google.com] *代表 *James Hawkins > *发送时间:* 2012年6月12日 01:30 > *收件人:* Paul Kinlan > *抄送:* Gaowenmei; public-web-intents@w3.org > *主题:* Re: Two questions about the Web Intents.**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 1:53 AM, Paul Kinlan <paulkinlan@google.com> > wrote:**** > > Hi,**** > > ** ** > > Some comments inline.**** > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 8:19 AM, Gaowenmei <gaowenmei@huawei.com> wrote:** > ** > > Hello,everyone:**** > > **** > > I am a newcomer here. These days I was studying the web intents spec and > felt great interest in this technology. Now I have some small questions, > and hope someone can help me to clarify the confusion.**** > > **** > > 1) When we click a button in the client page and trigger the > "startActivity()", UA will pop up a intent list and we will see some > suggestions there. I am wondering where are the suggestions from? Does the > UA search the intent services in real time? (for example, Chrome will > search the suitable intent services from the Chrome web app store?)**** > > ** ** > > The current implementation in Chrome understands the action and the data > type so it can query the Chrome webstore to get a list of suitable apps. > Claes and others on this list are working on the UPNP discovery for > external networked services that support the same actions on data.**** > > ** ** > > The actual method of suggestions is not too important once you realise > that we have these two key pieces of information we can use to discover > compatible services. The UA may choose to cache service suggestions, query > a service, or provide no suggestions at all.**** > > **** > > **** > > 2) Can the user manually add a URL to the popup intent list as a intent > service page? Thus, the user can add some intent service pages which are > found by himself or forwarded by his friends. This will be very useful for > users.**** > > ** ** > > Not quite, the developer will be able to specify their own suggestions in > the "suggestions" attribute of the Intent constructor object. With the > current implementation in Chrome you would ask the user to install the app > from the store.**** > > ** ** > > However it's important to keep in mind that the <intent> tag causes a web > page to be registered as an intent service once the user visits the page, > so in essence the user does have a way to "manually add" a service. It > stretches the definition of 'manually' though, as <intent> tag registration > is designed tob **** > > ** ** > > Thanks,**** > > James**** > > ** ** >
Received on Tuesday, 12 June 2012 15:34:26 UTC