- From: Nilsson, Claes1 <Claes1.Nilsson@sonymobile.com>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 12:31:51 +0200
- To: Mounir Lamouri <mounir@lamouri.fr>, "public-web-intents@w3.org" <public-web-intents@w3.org>
Ok, sounds reasonable to use the system level Contacts API in a Web Intents Service application supporting the "Pick contact" intent. So in addition the system level Contacts API we need to standardize the Web Intents interactions between Client and Service for contacts. Same would apply for other use cases. For example a Web Intents Service application for providing sensor data uses a system level Bluetooth API. Best regards Claes -----Original Message----- From: Mounir Lamouri [mailto:mounir@lamouri.fr] Sent: den 5 juni 2012 12:05 To: public-web-intents@w3.org Subject: Re: Web Intents based APIs On 06/05/2012 12:31 AM, Nilsson, Claes1 wrote: > Hi Mounir, > > So your message is: > > * The current Contacts API (http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/dap/raw-file/tip/contacts/Overview.html ) is a system level API and we shouldn't attempt binding it with Web Intents > * For simple interactions we can create a Web Intents based Contacts API, similar to Robin's proposal. > > Or are talking about a layered approach? > > Could you provide an example? Basically, if I want to implement a full featured Contacts App for a device, I need to use a real API. I do not think the goal of Web Intents is to solve those situations. However, if I want to build an app that wants to access a contact information, I would use Web Intents. For example, an email app might have a "add a contact" button that would use an Intent to get the contact from the Contacts App (that would be using in the backend the real Contacts API). One advantage is that way, the email app doesn't have to request any permission regarding reading contacts information because it is actually done by the Contacts App. Also, the email app doesn't have to re-built a UI. It can fully delegate that feature to the Contacts App. Is that clearer? Cheers, -- Mounir
Received on Tuesday, 5 June 2012 10:32:25 UTC