- From: Jean-Claude Dufourd <jean-claude.dufourd@telecom-paristech.fr>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 11:34:44 +0200
- To: public-web-intents@w3.org
On 27/7/12 17:17 , Greg Billock wrote: > On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 3:58 AM, John Lyle <john.lyle@cs.ox.ac.uk> wrote: >> Should all intent services provide an authorisation step (or perhas >> an 'undo' step) when they receive a request made via intents? > Basically, yes. The best practices there are to provide a confirmation > or verification step for the user. > JCD: Ooops ? This means that for normal intent invocation, there will be two consenting user actions, and for explicit intent invocation, only one. This sounds bad. It would be much better to have a unified behaviour between normal intent invocation and explicit intent invocation (i.e. always require active consent), so that the intent provider does not need to impose a (possibly second) consent action. Best regards JC -- JC Dufourd Directeur d'Etudes/Professor Groupe Multimedia/Multimedia Group Traitement du Signal et Images/Signal and Image Processing Telecom ParisTech, 37-39 rue Dareau, 75014 Paris, France Tel: +33145817733 - Mob: +33677843843 - Fax: +33145817144
Received on Friday, 24 August 2012 09:35:20 UTC