- From: <Cathy.Chan@nokia.com>
- Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:54:37 +0000
- To: <public-web-intents@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <A46437648ECB3D4F852B077AFF9099F518D57B6D@008-AM1MPN1-062.mgdnok.nokia.com>
>From the description of registration markup (3.5.1 in [1]): [[ action of type string, readonly An opaque string indicating the behavior class the service supports. It is recommended that users use a fully qualified URI. If the action attribute is missing, the intent Service is assumed to handle display of the provided type(s) in the type attributes. ]] What does "assumed to handle display of the provided type(s) in the type attributes" mean in practice? Also, 3.5 states that [[ The algorithm for matching intents is that the action string provided in invocation and registration must match exactly, and the type strings must match exactly except for possible [RFC2046] MIME subtype wildcards. ]] Given that the action string in invocation can never be empty/missing , the UA will never attempt to dispatch an intent to a service page with a missing action attribute. Wouldn't it be simpler to disallow missing action attribute in the registration markup in the first place (except in the case of unregistering the intent)? - Cathy. [1] http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/web-intents/raw-file/tip/spec/Overview.html
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: smime.p7s
Received on Monday, 16 April 2012 20:55:17 UTC