- From: Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 11:29:30 +0000
- To: public-web-intents@w3.org
- Message-ID: <4EC7931A.30603@w3.org>
First of all, many thanks for a nice and clear introduction. timeless wrote: > Web Intents is designed to address the problem of a Site wanting to do > a certain Action with a Partner known to the User but not the Site. > The User doesn't really want the Site to know which Partner the User > has selected, nor does the User really want the Partner to know which > Site caused the User to contact the Partner. The general principle of keeping the partner and the site at arms length is clear. > An intent could also be something like "get-temperature" In an application showing the temperature at many locations, presumably there is a way for the user to select multiple sensors, and for the application to access appropriate metadata for each sensor? In this example, the partner (the temperature sensor) wants to provide metadata to the site (e.g. its location), and it may be necessary for the user to give his/her consent. This points to the need to inform users prior to them making a decision as to which partners to use for this particular application. User's may want this application to remember these choices for next time the application runs. This imposes requirements on the web run-time to record them in a way that can be applied independently of the IP address for the sensor, as that may change. For a partner providing a service over a USB or Bluetooth connection, there may not be an IP address. One idea is to provide a means for users to assign persistent names to partners. This works nicely for Apple's Bonjour, which ensures that each service has a unique name, that is initialised with a stem provided by the device vendor, see: _http://developer.apple.com/library/mac/documentation/Cocoa/Conceptual/NetServices/NetServices.pdf_ The responsibility for managing the names for partners (i.e. services) would fall upon the web run-time, but could be delegated as appropriate. Another scenario is where an application presents a display of the presence of a dynamically changing population of service providers. An example could be an app on my smart phone showing the location of my friends at the Glastonbury festival where over a hundred thousand people are spread over a large area with many stages in a festival running over several days. In this case the intent identifies my friends, some of whom arrive a day late or leave a day early. This particular case could probably be addressed by mapping the intent to a service that itself tracks festival goers, and provides notifications when people arrive or leave. A more general question is how does Web Intents relate to notifications for when services become available or unavailable? I suspect that we should deal with that separately, but that we will want to reuse the intent names. What is the scope of the Web Intents specification? It clearly has to address the interface exposed to web applications seeking to use services. It could cover some standard intents e.g. printing, and services exposed by other websites. Perhaps we can address service registration and discovery more generally as a set of additional specifications, e.g. for home networking, and services provided over interconnect technologies such as USB, Bluetooth, NFC and Zigbee? Service specific specifications would cover the interfaces and/or protocols for given services. --- Dave Raggett <dsr@w3.org> http://www.w3.org/People/Raggett
Received on Saturday, 19 November 2011 11:30:07 UTC