- From: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Dec 2011 20:04:43 -0500
- To: WebIntents <public-web-intents@w3.org>
Greg wrote: > 1. The "action" and "type" fields of an intent should be opaque strings as > regards the API. seems reasonable > 2. What a service (Partner) can expect in the "data" field of the intent is > governed as a function of the "type" exclusively. seems reasonable > 3. What data the client should expect in return from a particular intent is a > more complex function, but a function strictly of inputs. However, it is not > strictly a function of the "type" field, but is instead a function of > the "action," "type," and possibly of parts of the "data" field as well. seems reasonable
Received on Friday, 23 December 2011 01:05:10 UTC