- From: James Hawkins <jhawkins@google.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 13:05:18 -0800
- To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Cc: timeless <timeless@gmail.com>, WebIntents <public-web-intents@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > On 12/6/11 11:36 AM, James Hawkins wrote: >> >> Since the current proposal requires the addition of an HTML tag, the >> proper place to discuss that addition is WhatWG; my intent was to have >> that part of the discussion happening orthogonaly to discussions about >> the rest of the API. If we have general approval in WhatWG, that's >> one less thing we need to take care of at a later point in time. If >> the members of this task force decide to take another route for >> registration, at least the discussion on WhatWG will at least be >> informative. > > > Isn't the "proper" place the public-html, public-html-a11y or associated > lists? > I've found to be the WhatWG a worth-while place to discuss, but its > member-base is limited. > > There are many parties that use w3c lists and are not monitoring the whatwg > list. > > I suggest taking the discussion to multiple lists. > > As you are aware, you're looking at strong push-back to simply use <meta> or > <link rel> semantics. > I posted on public-html yesterday, but it's still going through moderation. James
Received on Tuesday, 6 December 2011 21:06:25 UTC