- From: Klotz, Leigh <Leigh.Klotz@xerox.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:04:36 -0800
- To: <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- Cc: <public-web-http-desc@w3.org>, "Jurgielewicz, Mariusz" <Mariusz.Jurgielewicz@xerox.com>
>From: Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM [mailto:Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM] >Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 11:11 AM >To: Klotz, Leigh >Cc: public-web-http-desc@w3.org; Jurgielewicz, Mariusz >Subject: Re: WADL representation/@element in xmlns="" > > On Feb 27, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Klotz, Leigh wrote: > > 2. What the spec says > > Not seeing much discussion on this list about namespaces or xmlns, I > consulted the WADL paper to see how to express no-namespace @element > values. > > The wadl20090202 WADL paper says that representation/element is > defined as follows: > For XML-based representations, specifies the qualified name of the > root element as described within the grammars section - see section > 2.3. > > It seems like a good idea to be more precise here. > >Would it be sufficient to say that if the value of representation/ @element does not contain a prefix then the element is in no namespace ? > >Marc. That would make sense to me, since it makes definition of un-namespaced elements trivial. It's not what's implemented in the stylesheet, so the stylesheet would need to change. Similarly, it's possible binding tools (if any) have made decisions already, so authors of tools should be on the lookout as well. But your suggestion sound good to me. Thank you, Leigh.
Received on Wednesday, 4 March 2009 22:05:28 UTC