- From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 15:02:10 -0400
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: public-web-http-desc@w3.org
Received on Friday, 28 April 2006 19:02:19 UTC
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:12 -0700, Mark Nottingham wrote: > <resource introduced="/revision/1"> > <method name="GET"> > ... > </method> > <method name="POST" introduced="/revision/2"> > ... > </method> > </resource> Wouldn't you be able to resolve your use case by using dated links and a latest version link? Or is it important for you to follow the trail of revisions (ie you would need a "previous version" link). Philippe
Received on Friday, 28 April 2006 19:02:19 UTC