- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 12:50:59 +0900
- To: public-web-http-desc@w3.org
So, a bunch of us were sitting in the hotel bar last night, and came to the conclusion that it would be useful to start capturing information about Web description in a more organised fashion. As a result, I've seeded a bunch of pages on the W3C's ESW wiki, starting at: http://esw.w3.org/topic/WebDescription Please have a look and add what you can. One of the more interesting -- and promising -- things we discussed was the thought of capturing patterns of use for HTTP. A description format -- inevitably -- can't describe everything about an application; by its nature, it's incomplete. One of the problems I'm concerned about is that because of this, any description format that gets standardised (or even widespread adoption) will unavoidably encourage some patterns of use and discourage others. Note that this isn't the case with existing prose descriptions of Web APIs; it's only when you try to abstract out a generic description format that you have this problem. Therefore, it would be best to collect patterns of use by examining existing Web applications, APIs, standards that use HTTP, and tools that implement it, so that we can figure out which patterns are common, which ones give the most benefits within the architecture, and so forth. With some work, this will help inform the creation of formats so that they don't needlessly cut off some applications, or encourage bad patterns (for some value of bad). Look in WebDescriptionExamples and WebDescriptionPatterns for more (and to add!). I've just listed a few potential patterns to start with, and will try to flesh them out in time. Cheers, -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 10 November 2005 03:51:21 UTC