- From: Jan Algermissen <jalgermissen@topicmapping.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 22:08:35 +0200
- To: Marc Hadley <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>
- Cc: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, public-web-http-desc@w3.org
On Jun 16, 2005, at 9:29 PM, Marc Hadley wrote: >> Mark B.: >> I don't doubt that there might be exceptions, but I'm confident it's >> the general case, yes. >> >> > If you are correct and folks write custom libraries for all web > applications for a variety of common programming languages then I'd > agree with you: we don't need a web application description > language and we can all go do something else instead. Sorry to be nit picking, but I want to make sure I understand correctly: By Web application you guys refer to things like - a Google search - an Amazon purchase - a ticket in a trouble ticket system etc. yes? Jan > But, FWIW, I'm not convinced that this will happen and hence think > that a standard format for describing such applications has some > potential utility. > > >> Phew, I'm glad I got my point across. I was having www-ws-arch >> flashbacks for a moment there. 8-) Thanks for hearing me out on this >> complex issue. >> >> > I was perhaps fortunate to miss out on the www-ws-arch discussions. > > Cheers, > Marc. > > --- > Marc Hadley <marc.hadley at sun.com> > Business Alliances, CTO Office, Sun Microsystems. > > > ________________________________________________________________________ ____________________ Jan Algermissen, Consultant & Programmer http://jalgermissen.com Tugboat Consulting, 'Applying Web technology to enterprise IT' http://www.tugboat.de
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 20:08:43 UTC