- From: Jeffrey Yasskin <jyasskin@google.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:28:50 -0700
- To: Rob Moran <Rob.Moran@arm.com>
- Cc: "public-web-bluetooth@w3.org" <public-web-bluetooth@w3.org>
This may be more of a question for public-script-coord@w3.org, who govern the style of new web APIs. My understanding is that every new API is using Promises, and folks who want to adapt them back to callbacks can wrap them, just like folks who want to use Promises with old callback-based APIs have to wrap them. https://github.com/hybridables/promise2thunk looks close to what you want, but it works on the output of the function instead of transforming the function itself. Would a similar wrapping library do what you want? We haven't explicitly considered defining a hybrid API that accepts a callback and returns a promise, but I expect most web API experts will oppose that direction, since the web platform will have to keep supporting it even after everyone's switched to promises. Jeffrey On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Rob Moran <Rob.Moran@arm.com> wrote: > Hi group, > > > we've been following the web-bluetooth specification closely with interest > and with a view to implementing it as an abstraction interface over other > popular JavaScript-BLE implementations on web, server and mobile. > > > We are aware this is a web-bluetooth specification rather than > JavaScript-bluetooth, however it does rely heavily on the use of ES6 > promises, a paradigm not commonly used on many platforms (yet!). > > > Promises are an elegant approach to asynchronous programming, but even in > web development the use of promises could perhaps be considered a choice of > the developer and not forced by the API. > > > We were wondering if a hybrid approach was considered when defining the > specification which allows the choice of using promises (if available) or a > callback with an error object. > > > Examples of this approach can be seen in these npm modules: > > > https://www.npmjs.com/package/hybridify > > https://www.npmjs.com/package/handle-callback > > > Forgive my ignorance if discussions around this are already public. > > > > Kind regards, > > > Rob > > > > ________________________________ > > -- IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are > confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended > recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the > contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the > information in any medium. Thank you.
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2015 17:29:38 UTC