- From: JB via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 01:41:56 +0000
- To: public-web-bluetooth-log@w3.org
OK, so the Web Bluetooth spec is all about connecting devices around me to a website so that I can interact with that website in more interactive and complex fashion, right? What about apps for artists or musicians? Artists/musicians are notorious for using things as they were never intended by their creators to make or inspire new works. If you limit the API or service spec in such a draconian manner you will eventually limit the usefulness of the spec you are developing. Yes, by all means give me a method to search for advertised services BUT do not stop me from saying, "Hey! Use any BT-LE sensor as a tone controller for my way cool music app!" OR "Paint with your biorhythms and by banging your head on this impact sensor!" That was a poor attempt at humor but hopefully you see the point I'm making. Also, right now there is not a single manufacturer of a Automation IO device I have found that advertises correctly. I have to filter based on known names which is just irritating to no end! Anyways, thanks for considering my worthless two pennies on the topic of scanning. I personally believe this along with storing connections for reconstitution when returning is VERY important for acceptance and adoption by the public. -- GitHub Notification of comment by youcangetme Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/WebBluetoothCG/web-bluetooth/issues/234#issuecomment-218931554 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 13 May 2016 01:41:58 UTC