Re: [web-bluetooth] optionalServices is not very clear

Ah I see. I think adding examples, like these in questions in this 
GitHub issue, would really help making this clear.

Maybe we should call optional for additionalServices instead. In the 
{X, Y, B} example, B is just as optional, but if we call it 
additionalServices, it is more obvious that they are added to the poll
 of services which are allowed/can be used.

GitHub Notif of comment by kenchris

Received on Monday, 23 March 2015 17:36:23 UTC