- From: Kenneth Rohde Christiansen via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 17:07:46 +0000
- To: public-web-bluetooth-log@w3.org
I definitely get the point of not listing it twice, but it might be
possible to annotate the services, like { service: x, optional: true }
or similar, but as you said, that might mean that people might miss a
few services.
I agree that this definitely needs examples.
So what if I have a devices only supporting some of the optional
services? Would that always be useless? because as I understand it,
such a device would be ignored with the current API, right?
--
GitHub Notif of comment by kenchris
See
https://github.com/WebBluetoothCG/web-bluetooth/issues/82#issuecomment-85098380
Received on Monday, 23 March 2015 17:07:57 UTC